Theoretical Aspects of Lexical Analysis/Exercise 9

From Wiki**3

< Theoretical Aspects of Lexical Analysis
Revision as of 19:31, 29 March 2009 by Root (talk | contribs) (Input Analysis)

Compute the non-deterministic finite automaton (NFA) by using Thompson's algorithm. Compute the minimal deterministic finite automaton (DFA).
The alphabet is Σ = { a, b }. Indicate the number of processing steps for the given input string.

  • G = { a*, ba*, a|b* }, input string = aababb

NFA

The following is the result of applying Thompson's algorithm. State 4 recognizes the first expression (token T1); state 9 recognizes token T2; and state 17 recognizes token T3.


DFA

Determination table for the above NFA:

In α∈Σ move(In, α) ε-closure(move(In, α)) In+1 = ε-closure(move(In, α))
- - 0 0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16, 17 0 (T1)
0 a 3, 12 2, 3, 4, 12, 17 1 (T1)
0 b 6, 15 6, 7, 9, 14, 15, 16, 17 2 (T2)
1 a 3 2, 3, 4 3 (T1)
1 b - - -
2 a 8 7, 8, 9 4 (T2)
2 b 15 14, 15, 16, 17 5 (T3)
3 a 3 2, 3, 4 3 (T1)
3 b - - -
4 a 8 7, 8, 9 4 (T2)
4 b - - -
5 a - - -
5 b 15 14, 15, 16, 17 5 (T3)

Graphically, the DFA is represented as follows:


The minimization tree is as follows. Note that before considering transition behavior, states are split according to the token they recognize.


The tree expansion for non-splitting sets has been omitted for simplicity ("a" transitions for super-state {0, 1, 3}, and "a" and "b" transitions for super-state {1,3}).

Given the minimization tree, the final minimal DFA is as follows. Note that states 2 and 4 cannot be the same since they recognize different tokens.


Input Analysis

In Input In+1 / Token
0 aababb$ 13
13 ababb$ 13
13 babb$ T1 (aa)
0 babb$ 2
2 abb$ 4
4 bb$ T2 (ba)
0 bb$ 2
2 b$ 5
5 $ T3 (bb)

The input string aababb is, after 9 steps, split into three tokens: T1 (corresponding to lexeme aa), T2 (ba), and T3 (bb).