Difference between revisions of "Code Generation/Example 2"

From Wiki**3

< Code Generation
(Compiling and Running)
Line 48: Line 48:
 
To test the first example, the S9 compilation process is as follows:
 
To test the first example, the S9 compilation process is as follows:
  
* s9 batata.s9
+
s9 batata.s9
* yasm -felf batata.asm
+
yasm -felf batata.asm
* ld -o batata batata.o -lrts
+
ld -o batata batata.o -lrts
  
 
To test the second program directly, [[pf2asm]] can be used:
 
To test the second program directly, [[pf2asm]] can be used:
  
* pf2asm batata.pf
+
pf2asm batata.pf
* yasm -felf batata.asm
+
yasm -felf batata.asm
* ld -o batata batata.o -lrts
+
ld -o batata batata.o -lrts
  
 
[[category:Compiladores]]
 
[[category:Compiladores]]
 
[[category:Ensino]]
 
[[category:Ensino]]

Revision as of 11:58, 16 February 2017

The Original Code

Consider the following S9 function:

<c> string a = "batata"; int s9() -> 0 {

     a!

} </c>

Postfix Code

The Postfix code for the above function is as follows:

<asm>

--- declaring the string literal

RODATA ALIGN LABEL _L123  ;; automatic label STR "batata"

--- declaring the global variable "a"

DATA ALIGN LABEL a ID _L123  ;; automatic label

--- this is the main function (note that "s9" translates to RTS's "_main")

TEXT ALIGN GLOBL _main, FUNC LABEL _main ENTER 0

ADDRV a  ;; ADDRV = ADDR+LOAD EXTRN prints CALL prints TRASH 4

INT 0 POP LEAVE RET </asm>

Compiling and Running

To test the first example, the S9 compilation process is as follows:

s9 batata.s9
yasm -felf batata.asm
ld -o batata batata.o -lrts

To test the second program directly, pf2asm can be used:

pf2asm batata.pf
yasm -felf batata.asm
ld -o batata batata.o -lrts