Difference between revisions of "Code Generation/Example 2"

From Wiki**3

< Code Generation
(The Original Code)
(Compiling and Running)
Line 48: Line 48:
  
 
== Compiling and Running ==
 
== Compiling and Running ==
 
+
<!--
 
To test the first example, the S9 compilation process is as follows:
 
To test the first example, the S9 compilation process is as follows:
  
Line 54: Line 54:
 
  yasm -felf batata.asm
 
  yasm -felf batata.asm
 
  ld -o batata batata.o -lrts
 
  ld -o batata batata.o -lrts
 
+
-->
 
To test the second program directly, [[Compiladores/Projecto de Compiladores/Compiladores Exemplo|pf2asm]] can be used:
 
To test the second program directly, [[Compiladores/Projecto de Compiladores/Compiladores Exemplo|pf2asm]] can be used:
  

Revision as of 09:05, 29 April 2020

The Original Code

Consider the following C function:

const char *a = "batata";
int main {
  prints(a);
  return 0;
}

Postfix Code

The Postfix code for the above function is as follows:

Postfix code
;--- declaring the string literal
RODATA
ALIGN
LABEL _L123  ;; automatic label
STR "batata"
;--- declaring the global variable "a"
DATA
ALIGN
LABEL a
SADDR  _L123  ;; automatic label

;--- this is the main function (note that "s9" translates to RTS's "_main")
TEXT
ALIGN
GLOBL _main, FUNC
LABEL _main
ENTER 0

ADDR a
LDINT
EXTRN prints
CALL prints
TRASH 4

INT 0
STFVAL32
LEAVE
RET

Compiling and Running

To test the second program directly, pf2asm can be used:

pf2asm batata.pf
yasm -felf batata.asm
ld -o batata batata.o -lrts