Difference between revisions of "Bottom-Up Parsing/Exercise 9: LALR(1)"
From Wiki**3
< Bottom-Up Parsing
(→Solução) |
(→Problema) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Problema == | == Problema == | ||
| − | Consider the following grammar, where E is the initial symbol and { [, ], ;, id } is the set of terminal symbols: | + | Consider the following grammar, where '''E''' is the initial symbol and '''{ [, ], ;, id }''' is the set of terminal symbols: |
| − | <text> | + | <source lang="text"> |
| − | E | + | E → [ E ; L ] | id |
| − | L | + | L → E | E ; L |
| − | </ | + | </source> |
# Compute the set of LALR(1) states for the grammar. Build the corresponding LALR(1) parse table. | # Compute the set of LALR(1) states for the grammar. Build the corresponding LALR(1) parse table. | ||
# Show the parsing process for input '''[id;id;id]''' (including the actions/gotos and the input and stack states). In case of conflict, assume YACC's behavior. | # Show the parsing process for input '''[id;id;id]''' (including the actions/gotos and the input and stack states). In case of conflict, assume YACC's behavior. | ||
Latest revision as of 11:49, 2 May 2024
Problema
Consider the following grammar, where E is the initial symbol and { [, ], ;, id } is the set of terminal symbols:
E → [ E ; L ] | id
L → E | E ; L
- Compute the set of LALR(1) states for the grammar. Build the corresponding LALR(1) parse table.
- Show the parsing process for input [id;id;id] (including the actions/gotos and the input and stack states). In case of conflict, assume YACC's behavior.
- Is this an LL(1) grammar? Why?
Solução
| [Expand] Solução completa |
|---|
